Saturday, 27 August 2016

Zambia mining industry says new rules to scare investors, deter local processing

Zambia's Chamber of Mines is asking the government to reconsider its decision to hike corporate income tax rate on mineral processing from 30% to 35%, effective since July 1, as they claim it will scare away investors and discourage processing to add value.
The country, Africa's second largest copper producer, also resolved last month to cut mineral royalty rates from 8% to 6% for underground operations, and from 20% to 9% for open cast mines.
Maureen Jangulo Dlamini, head of the mines chamber, said the industry is not happy with the new tax regime, originally aimed to put an end to a nine-month standoff that severely hit the country’s output and profits.
“A two-tiered rate, differentiated by mining method, is not conducive to the long-term health of the industry and government revenues,” she said in a statement. “It does not address the need for continued investment in the country’s mines, nor does it address the fact that there are some opencast mines with higher operating costs than underground mines and vice versa.”
Withheld value-added tax (VAT) refunds continue to be another point of contention between authorities and the mining industry.
For years, the government has declined refunds to mining companies and other exporters, which they say have not produced import certificates from destination countries — a step the government considers key to full transparency.
But miners argue it is impossible to do because third parties trade their commodities.
So far major copper miners are owed nearly $800 million in VAT refunds stretching back to 2013, data from the chamber of mines shows.
Mining accounts for 12% of gross domestic product (GDP) and 10% of formal employment in Zambia.
Source: Mining.com

Glencore posts worst half-yearly profit since listing in London

Shares in Glencore (LON: GLEN) were down 5.2% at noon in London after the miner and commodity trader reported a significant drop in underlying earnings and revealed it has taken a $400 million hit related to an accounting mismatch over coal derivatives.
Despite a rebound in commodity prices and reduced costs in the six months to end-June, the Swiss company logged a $369 million net loss in the period compared with a $676 million net loss in the same period last year.
Glencore logged first-half adjusted EBITDA of $4 billion, 13% lower than a year ago, and the worst half-annual profit since listing in London in 2011.
But there also were good news, as the world’s third-largest diversified miner by market value said it was “pretty likely” it would resume paying dividends before it reports results in March.
Glencore suspended dividend last year as part of an aggressive plan to cut a $30 billion debt load it had a year ago. It was one of the highest in the industry at the time, as prices for its key products copper and coal sank to multi-year lows.
The firm also said it has stepped up its debt reduction plans and it is now targeting net debt of $16.5 to $17.5 billion by the end of the year, against $17bn to $18bn previously.
It has also successfully off-load assets, including the sale of almost 50% of its agriculture business for about $3.1 billion earlier this year. Overall, Glencore has sold $3.9bn of the $4n to $5bn asset disposals target, but it has yet to find buyers for its Australian coal train fleet, the Lomas Bayas copper mine in Chile, its Cobar mine in Australia’s New South Wales, and a gold mine in Kazakhstan.
Before postings half-year results, the company agreed tosell a stake in its Ernest Henry copper mine in Australia to Evolution Mining (ASX:EVN) for $670 million (A$880 million).
Glencore’s trading division, or what the company calls marketing, logged Ebitda of $1.2bn in the first half of the year, a 14% increase from a year ago thanks to better performance in metals.
The company, which makes about a quarter of its earnings from commodities trading, maintained its full-year guidance for the unit of $2.4bn to $2.7bn.
With a a market value of about $34.5 billion, Glencore has become this year’s third-best performer in the U.K.’s benchmark stock index.
Source: Mining.com

Mining has nothing to fear from Fed rate hikes

As expected, the prices of gold and copper are down ahead of the US Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen's much anticipated annual speech on the direction of monetary policy.
The consensus seems to have shifted in favour of earlier interest rate hikes  than previously thought and the feverish speculation about what will transpire at Jackson Hole has seen an old research report being passed around again.
Two years ago Allianz Global Investors released an excellent study comparing the returns of different asset classes during Fed rate-hike cycles. The German firm with assets under management of $521 billion, looked at the six tightening periods since 1983.
The author of the report Martin Hochstein, Senior Strategist, said "conventional wisdom seems to suggest that a tightening of monetary policy should weigh on financial markets in general and risky assets in particular. The good news is that this assumption is not corroborated by historical evidence":
Commodities – and notably industrial metals and energy, which are the most growth-sensitive subsectors – did particularly well, with an average gain of more than 25%.
While that bodes well for metals and mining stocks, Hochstein does warn that the current rate hike cycle is different given the unconventional policies like quantitative easing that the Fed has employed (not to mention past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results and all that)
Source: Allianz Global Investors
Click here for the full report.

Iron ore’s rally has its days numbered — Citi

Iron ore prices climbed again Tuesday to $61.75 a tonne, just off a four-month high, taking this year’s gains to more than 40% to date.
The spot price for benchmark 62% fines added 52 cents overnight, according to The Metal Bulletin, on increased activity and strength in the steel market.
But the bonanza should soon be over, say analysts led by investment bank Citi, which warns that current prices are simply not sustainable.
“There are short- to medium-term risks in iron ore and coal as the impact of Chinese stimulus that has boosted the 2016 year to date abates,” Citi analysts wrote in a research note, quoted by Bloomberg.
Despite calling it a "darling" of commodities so far this year, they noted that falling demand, coupled with increasing mine supply, would probably hurt iron ore prices thereafter.
As such, Citi believes the steel-making ingredient will average $51 a tonne in the final quarter of the year and $45 in 2017.
Their view is backed by BHP Billiton (ASX, NYSE:BHP) (LON:BLT), the world’s largest mining company and the No.3 iron ore producer, which has repeatedly said prices for the commodity willremain low for at least another ten years due to oversupply.
Source: Mining.com

Gold juniors’ Q2’16 fundamentals

The junior gold miners and explorers have soared dramatically in an amazing year, before falling hard this week.  This sharp correction is doing its job in rebalancing bull-market sentiment, crushing greed and leaving traders wary of this sector.  But gold juniors’ recently-released second-quarter financial and operational results prove their fundamentals are strengthening dramatically, a very bullish omen for stock prices.
The junior gold stocks are rightfully considered the Wild West of the gold sector.  Most of the hundreds and hundreds of these small companies won’t prove successful.  They won’t be able to secure funding to explore sufficiently, won’t be fortunate enough to find an economic deposit of gold to mine, or won’t be able to make the herculean leap from explorer to miner.  The odds are stacked heavily against the gold juniors.
Nevertheless, the elite small gold explorers and miners able to overcome and grow their businesses to larger scales will see truly-enormous stock-price gains.  The gold juniors are exceedingly important for the entire gold-mining industry, since they feed the critical gold-supply pipeline with new deposits and mines to offset the inexorable industry-wide depletion of current operations.  Success here is radically rewarded.
Many of the world’s best junior gold miners and explorers are included in the GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF, this sector’s leading benchmark.  GDXJ began trading in November 2009, and is the world’s second-largest gold-stock ETF after its big brother GDX which tracks larger gold miners.  As of the middle of this week, GDXJ’s net assets ran about half of GDX’s.  This testifies to junior golds’ popularity.
And it’s easy to understand why in 2016.  Between gold stocks’ fundamentally-absurd 13.5-year secular lows in mid-January and last week, GDXJ blasted 202.5% higher in just 7.0 months!  While I don’t have universal ETF data, I’d be shocked if any other sizable ETF in all the markets even came remotely close.  For comparison, over essentially that same span GDX “only” soared 151.2%.  The juniors’ gains have been epic.
But in the single trading week since GDXJ’s dazzling new bull high, this ETF has plunged 14.6% as of this Wednesday which is the data cutoff for this essay.  Seeing over 1/7th of the value of even these elite juniors included in GDXJ lopped off in a handful of trading days has really unsettled investors.  But it certainly shouldn’t have.  Gold stocks are a volatile sector, where sharp bull-market corrections are common.
This important sentiment-rebalancing phenomenon necessary to ensure healthy and long-lasting bull markets last happened in May, which wasn’t too long ago.  GDXJ dropped 14.6% in a month, which also served to eradicate greed while breeding serious pessimism.  Yet out of those very lows, GDXJ would surge another 57.2% higher by mid-August.  That bucked gold stocks’ summer-doldrums downside risks.
Now normally during major mid-bull corrections, investors assume selloffs driven purely by sentiment must be fundamentally justified.  If the junior golds are falling, surely it’s because their costs are rising and operating profits are falling.  But that’s rarely true.  Corrections are triggered when greed grows too excessive.  That enthusiasm sucks in all near-term buyers leaving only sellers, spawning sharp selloffs.
With this newest correction underway, we have the great benefit of the junior gold miners and explorers just finishing reporting their Q2’16 results.  Companies trading in the US and Canada are required by their securities regulators to file quarterly reports four times a year.  These reports are generally due 45 calendar days after quarter-ends, meaning mid-August.  So the latest junior-gold fundamentals are just available.
This week I dug through the new second-quarter reports for GDXJ’s top 34 component companies.  That arbitrary number happens to fit neatly into the tables below.  While GDXJ held a whopping 47 different stocks as of the middle of this week, the top 34 account for a commanding 93.1% of its total weighting.  They include many of the best junior gold miners and explorers in the business, a great cross section.
Each quarter I look at these companies’ 10-Qs filed with the SEC, or the equivalents for Canadian and Australian companies.  I feed a bunch of data into a spreadsheet to help me better understand how the individual companies and junior golds as a whole are faring.  The tables below summarize some of the key data, and prove that gold juniors’ fundamentals are strong and improving rapidly.  This is very bullish.
The initial columns show each top GDXJ component’s stock symbol, its exchange traded on, its current weighting within GDXJ, and its market capitalization.  GDXJ is generally market-capitalization weighted, which is the most logical way to construct ETFs for any sector.  That’s followed by trailing-twelve-month price-to-earnings ratios, which are left blank when companies are still operating at an accounting loss.
Next comes the junior gold miners’ costs, the dominant factor affecting their profitability.  Both the cash costs per ounce and all-in sustaining costs per ounce are included, along with the full-year-2016 projections for AISC if provided.  Then comes cash on hand at the end of Q2’16, its percentage of each GDXJ component’s market capitalization, and the cash flows generated from operations in the second quarter.
Finally each company’s quarterly gold production is included.  Somewhat oddly, GDXJ’s managers have chosen to include plenty of the large silver miners in their “Junior Gold Miners ETF”.  With so many gold juniors to choose from, this dilution of focus seems unnecessary.  So for the large silver miners in GDXJ, I listed their gold-only production whenever provided.  No production means a company is an explorer.
Despite this past week’s sharp bull-market correction, the junior gold stocks are thriving fundamentally.  Their costs are stable or improving, while their operating cash flows are soaring.  Investors who loved the junior golds a couple weeks ago ought to be scrambling to buy aggressively now that their stocks are considerably cheaper.  Their rapidly-improving fundamentals reveal nothing at all to be concerned about.
GDXJ’s component list remains very similar to that seen 3 months ago when I was analyzing this ETF’s top components’ Q1’16 results.  Most of the same companies are still included, although their relative rankings have naturally shifted with their market capitalizations.  The elite juniors enjoying the biggest market-cap increases, and hence stock-price gains, have seen the largest weighting increases in GDXJ.
This sector’s trailing-twelve-month price-to-earnings ratios are terrible, making junior golds look wildly overvalued from a classic valuation perspective.  Most of these companies have lost money during the past year in accounting terms, and thus have no P/Es.  And most of the junior golds that have managed to earn profits have very-high P/E ratios.  This apparently-dismal earnings situation is scaring investors away.
The reason these trailing-twelve-month P/Es look so ugly is the gold-mining industry was forced to make big non-cash writedowns late last year.  Gold sinking to dismal 6.1-year secular lows impaired the value of gold deposits and mines.  Accounting rules then forced company managers to assume gold’s deep lows would persist indefinitely.  So Q4’15 in particular saw massive writedowns of gold-mining assets.
Even though these are essentially an accounting fiction, non-cash expenses flushing once-capitalized historic costs out of balance sheets and through income statements, they affect GAAP profits.  So until last year’s big writedowns slide out of the latest four quarters’ results, P/E ratios will look ridiculous.  The strong operating profitability of gold miners won’t become apparent until Q4’16’s results, collapsing P/E ratios.
If you want more depth on the accounting issues skewing gold stocks’ P/E ratios to scary extremes, last week in my Q2’16 analysis of the larger gold miners of GDX I discussed it deeper.  Today’s P/E ratios simply don’t reflect the radical fundamental improvements in gold miners’ operations as 2016 marches on.  They will eventually, but for now investors have to look deeper to understand how gold miners are faring.
That starts with the junior golds’ cash costs per ounce.  With the magnitude of this GDXJ selloff over the past week, you’d think low-$1300s gold is a major threat to the juniors.  Nothing could be farther from the truth!  Cash costs are the acid test of gold miners’ viability, what it actually costs to wrest each ounce of gold from the bowels of the earth.  Gold miners face no existential peril as long as gold prices exceed cash costs.
Cash costs include all direct production costs, mine-level administration, smelting, refining, transport, regulatory, royalty, and tax expenses.  In Q2’16, the top junior gold miners included in GDXJ averaged cash costs of just $636 per ounce.  That is actually 2.8% lower than Q1’16’s $654, showing that the gold juniors are still improving the efficiency of their mining operations despite this year’s higher gold prices.
But cash costs are misleading, as they don’t include the full costs necessary to maintain an ongoing gold-mining operation.  As gold deposits inexorably deplete, new ones must be found and developed to replenish current production levels.  So in June 2013, the World Gold Council introduced a far-superior gold-mining cost measure called all-in sustaining costs.  This is rightfully usurping cash costs’ long reign.
AISC include all direct cash costs, corporate-level administration to oversee gold mines, exploration for new gold to mine, mine-development and construction expenses, remediation, and mine reclamation following economic depletion.  They are what it really costs per ounce to keep a gold-mining business humming along at current output levels indefinitely.  And the gold juniors’ AISC remain outstanding!
In Q2’16, these elite GDXJ components reported gold all-in sustaining costs averaging a level of $887.  That’s a slight 0.7% improvement from Q1’16’s $893.  Again the junior gold miners are wringing out new operational efficiencies even while higher gold prices are removing the pressure to do so.  Even more impressively, GDXJ components’ average AISC are identical to GDX components’average of $886 in Q2’16!
The large gold miners enjoy considerable economies of scale compared to the juniors.  Companies that manage multiple mines save on relative administration and procurement expenses compared to smaller ones operating single or fewer mines.  So it’s pretty darned impressive that the junior golds reported the same all-in-sustaining-cost structure in Q2’16 as the majors!  That’s an incredible show of fundamental strength.
The junior golds’ AISC compared to average prevailing gold levels reveal their true operating profitability that is masked by their writedown-distorted trailing-twelve-month P/E ratios.  Back in Q1’16 as gold was emerging from last year’s brutal rate-hike-fear-driven secular lows, this metal averaged $1185.  At the gold juniors’ Q1’16 average AISC of $893, those gold levels yielded operating profits of $292 per ounce.
Now that’s not bad at all considering investors were wrongly convinced the junior golds were doomed back in mid-January.  During Q2’16 the average gold price climbed 6.3% to $1259.  Thus at their latest industry-wide AISC read of $887 per ounce in that same quarter, operating profits blasted 27.5% higher quarter-on-quarter to $372 per ounce!  28% profits growth on a 6% gold rally is certainly very impressive.
This great profits leverage to gold inherent in the junior gold miners is the dominant reason why they’re so attractive to smart investors.  Profits ultimately drive stock prices, and gold-mining profits rocket higher on relatively-modest gold-price increases.  With gold itself in a major new bull market, the massive surge in gold-mining profits that’s going to generate will be breathtaking.  We’re already seeing that continue in Q3’16.
So far this quarter, gold has averaged $1341 which is another 6.5% gain sequentially.  Meanwhile the elite GDXJ gold miners projected full-year-2016 all-in sustaining costs averaging $883 per ounce.  That is also incidentally better than the major miners of GDX which are forecasting $888.  That means GDXJ’s junior miners are likely earning $458 per ounce in operating profits so far in Q3’16, another 23.1% QoQ jump!
At best year-to-date, GDXJ soared 169.1% higher by mid-August.  These epic gains were a combination of a mean reversion higher out of fantastically-bearish sentiment, and greatly-improving fundamentals.  Back in that dark trough quarter of Q4’15, GDXJ’s junior gold miners were earning $293 per ounce with AISC of $812 and gold averaging $1105.  In just two quarters, these operating margins surged 27.3% higher!
And that’s just the beginning.  Gold mines enjoy such great profits leverage to gold because mine costs are largely fixed during each mine’s planning stages.  That’s when mining engineers decide which ore bodies to extract, how to dig them, and how to process that ore to recover the gold.  These costs simply don’t change much regardless of what gold’s price does.  So higher gold translates into far-higher profits.
The best proxy of actual profitability of current operations comes from the cash flows generated by these very operations.  In Q2’16, these elite juniors of GDXJ earned collective operating cash flows of $949m.  That was a staggering 51.1% higher quarter-on-quarter compared to Q1’16’s $628m!  That trounces the 32.3% improvement over that same span seen by GDX’s major gold miners.  The juniors are killing it.
That hard data alone, operating cash flows rocketing 50%+ higher in a single quarter, provides all the fundamental justification junior golds need for their far-higher stock prices.  And that’s only going to keep improving.  Gold itself continues to mean revert out of extremely-oversold levels from late last year.  As recently as 2012 before the Fed’s gross market distortions, gold averaged a normal $1669 per ounce.
While gold will head a lot higher in this young new bull as today’s lofty stock markets artificially goosed to near-bubble valuations by central banks inevitably roll over into major new bears, consider that very-conservative 2012 example.  A $1669 gold price is only another third higher than Q2’16’s average level.  Yet at current all-in sustaining costs it would catapult gold-mining profitability 110% higher to $782 per ounce!
With Q2’16’s massive leap in operating cash flows, the cash hoards of these elite GDXJ gold juniors should have exploded proportionally.  Yet they didn’t, only climbing 4.1% QoQ to $4571m.  The reason is very bullish.  The cash-flow statements from these gold juniors showed many are spending big on mine expansions or new-mine builds.  These will eventually boost their production and thus future profitability.
One example is Pretium Resources, the largest explorer included in GDXJ under its symbol PVG.  This company is constructing an amazing new gold mine in northern British Columbia.  This $697m project is fully-funded, set to go live less than a year from now.  Pretium’s cash balance fell 22% from $367m at the end of Q1’16 to $287m at the end of Q2’16 because it invested $155m in its new mine build in H1’16!
Pretium certainly isn’t the only elite junior gold miner or explorer making big investments in growing their future production.  It’s really exciting to see the junior-gold industry hit the ground running following that existential scare late last year and early this year.  Investors would be richly rewarded if the elite junior golds merely reaped gold’s coming bull-market gains at current production levels.  Higher ones amplify gains.
I’ve been studying and trading gold stocks for over two decades now, and each quarter I wade through their operating results.  And the transformation this left-for-dead sector underwent operationally in Q2’16 simply due to higher prevailing gold prices was amazing.  If a mere 6%ish gold rally can so greatly boost the junior golds’ operating profits and cash flows, imagine what the rest of this young new gold bull will do.
So if you liked the junior golds a couple weeks ago when they were still climbing, you should love them today at correction discounts.  The best times to add new positions within ongoing bull markets are after significant selloffs, not near preceding highs when excitement abounds.  Investors looking to ride the epic coming profits growth in the junior golds can certainly take a stake in GDXJ, their benchmark ETF.
But GDXJ has serious issues that will retard its ultimate gains.  In addition to its heavy silver focus due to the high weightings of major silver miners in this “Junior Gold Miners ETF”, it is way over-diversified.  Too many holdings dilute the massive gains coming from the best individual gold juniors commanding superior fundamentals.  So why not jettison the deadweight within GDXJ and just own the best of its stocks?
At Zeal we’ve spent literally tens of thousands of hours researching individual gold stocks and markets, so we can better decide what to trade and when.  This has resulted in 838 stock trades recommended in real-time for our newsletter subscribers since 2001.  Their average annualized realized gains including all losers are running way up at +20.2%!  And that’s excluding the big unrealized gains on our books today.
They’re as high as 350% this week, with many doubles and triples this year alone, even after this past week’s sharp correction.  We’ve also got a major new gold-stock and silver-stock deployment underway to ride the coming upleg.  You can read about our new trades and market timing in our acclaimed weekly and monthly newsletters.  They draw on our vast experience, knowledge, wisdom, and ongoing research to explain what’s going on in the markets, why, and how to trade them with specific stocks.  Subscribe today!  For just $10 an issue, you can learn to think, trade, and thrive like a contrarian.
The bottom line is the gold juniors just reported an amazing Q2’16.  The modestly-higher average gold prices fueled huge gains in cash-flow generation and operating profitability.  Many junior gold miners are plowing these soaring surpluses into expanding their existing operations, ultimately leading to even higher production and greater future profitability.  The junior golds’ fundamentals are dramatically improving.
Unfortunately most investors aren’t yet aware of this hyper-bullish transformation underway.  This year’s massive surge in operating profitability is being masked by writedown-distorted P/E ratios.  And this past week’s sharp gold-stock correction has ramped up fear again scaring investors away.  For those smart enough to overcome herd sentiment and study the junior golds’ fundamentals, their stocks are really on sale.
Adam Hamilton, CPA

Friday, 26 August 2016

Striking Bolivian miners lift roadblock after killing country’s deputy minister

Striking Bolivian miners lifted Friday a roadblock where violent protests took place this week, a day after kidnapping and allegedly torturing and beating to death the country’s deputy interior minister, Rodolfo Illanes.
The miners, who have been demanding more mining concessions, the right to work for private companies, and greater union representation, seized Illanes (56) and his bodyguard early Thursday in Panduro, south of capital La Paz, Peruvian paper El Comercio reported (in Spanish).
He had traveled to the area to negotiate with the miners. His body was found in early Friday morning by the side of the highway that connects La Paz with the city of Oruro, wrapped in a blanket, Bolivia 
President Evo Morales called the brutal act a "political conspiracy,” criticizing the "cowardly attitude" of the protesters and insisting on that his government had "always been open" to negotiation, paperLa Demajuana reported (in Spanish).
Long-running tensions between miners and the government over strict regulations approved in 2014grew increasingly violent over the past few days.
Two miners were killed Wednesday after shots were fired by police, Reuters reported.
After Illanes' death, Defense Minister Reymi Ferreira broke down on national television.
"This crime will not go unpunished," Ferreira said, telling audiences that about 100 people have been arrested.
On Twitter, Attorney General Hector Arce called Illanes "a great man and lawyer who served his country," vowing that justice would be served.
Mining is deeply embedded in Bolivia's national identity. During colonial times, so much silver was shipped from mines in the southern region of Potosi to Europe that people used to say a bridge of pure silver could be built from the top of Cerro Rico Mountain to the royal palace's entrance in Spain.
But that boom came at an extremely high price tag — an estimated eight million slaves died in Potosi alone between 1500 and 1800 AD.
By the time mining was nationalized after the 1952 national revolution, tin had long since ousted silver as the main mineral product. In the 1980s a sharp fall in commodity prices led to a shutdown of the government mines, displacing 25,000 salaried miners.
The industry was privatized again in 1990s under neoliberal structural adjustment policies that ended up destroying Bolivia's miners-led revolutionary trade union movement, once the most combative in Latin America.
When Morales, South America's first indigenous President, took office in 2006, he immediately hiked mining taxes for foreigners and nationalized the country’s key natural gas industry. He also expropriated the telecommunications and electricity sectors, and seized several assets, including those of Vancouver-based South American Silver Corp. (TSX:SAC) in 2012, and Glencore’s (LON: GLEN), which recently announced it was taking Bolivia to an international court over the issue.
Bolivian mining cooperatives account for about 35% of the country’s mining output. They are tax-exempt organizations and pay royalties at lower rates than other mining companies.
Though rich in mineral and energy resources, data from the Unicef shows that Bolivia is one of the poorest countries in Latin America and the weakest economy in all of South America.
Source: Mining.com